<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 3.51 Transitional//EN"><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Passion of Mel Gibson</title>
	<link>http://rational.org/blog/26/</link>
	<description>Alcoholism, Drug Addiction, AA, 12-step</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dave C</title>
		<link>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-59161</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-59161</guid>
					<description>Attention American Medical Association!

Jack Trimpey says - Alcoholism is NOT a disease.  Therefore, that 15 year study where it was proven that alcohol in certain individuals metabolizes itself into Acetaldehyde, then Dopamine, then finally to THIQ causing a reaction much like heroin - it's rubbish.  Garbage!  Thank you Jack for clearing that up for us!

Clearly AA's central indoctrination of its members convincing them that not only can they never drink again but that they have to experience a psychic change to ensure that they will never feel a need to drink again is the wrong approach.  A person should NEVER have to change in order to get rid of their bad habits and their desire to partake in them!  That's just pure insanity!

And now I am going to go pray.... er ... converse with the Addictive Voice in my head - that's much more rational.  Thank you again Jack!
&lt;blockquote&gt;Dave,&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Your objection has gotten lost in lame sarcasm. I gather you are insisting that the act of self-intoxication is an innocent disease symptom, in spite of never seeing any scientific evidence of a disease yourself. You never saw the THIQ study, Dave, because that is urban legend stuff, i.e., the THIQ-laden cadaver tale. When I educate physicians, I always ask, “What effect do brain juices (neurotransmitters) have when applied to striated muscle tissue, such as the bicep? They see immediately that voluntary muscle is sympathetic NS controlled, and that addiction is voluntary, purposeful, free-will stupidity.Check out the evidence page for more background on the addictive disease scam:&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;http://www.rational.org/html_public_area/evidence.html&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;I hope you aren’t fronting a pretend disease to your family or to the taxpayers who have to clean up after your messes, especially if you are receiving pretend treatments that cost everyone else lots of money and peace of mind. If you won’t guarantee me, your family, and the world you’ll never drink/use again, then you lack the moral standing for polite company.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Jack Trimpey&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attention American Medical Association!</p>
<p>Jack Trimpey says - Alcoholism is NOT a disease.  Therefore, that 15 year study where it was proven that alcohol in certain individuals metabolizes itself into Acetaldehyde, then Dopamine, then finally to THIQ causing a reaction much like heroin - it&#8217;s rubbish.  Garbage!  Thank you Jack for clearing that up for us!</p>
<p>Clearly AA&#8217;s central indoctrination of its members convincing them that not only can they never drink again but that they have to experience a psychic change to ensure that they will never feel a need to drink again is the wrong approach.  A person should NEVER have to change in order to get rid of their bad habits and their desire to partake in them!  That&#8217;s just pure insanity!</p>
<p>And now I am going to go pray&#8230;. er &#8230; converse with the Addictive Voice in my head - that&#8217;s much more rational.  Thank you again Jack!</p>
<blockquote><p>Dave,</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Your objection has gotten lost in lame sarcasm. I gather you are insisting that the act of self-intoxication is an innocent disease symptom, in spite of never seeing any scientific evidence of a disease yourself. You never saw the THIQ study, Dave, because that is urban legend stuff, i.e., the THIQ-laden cadaver tale. When I educate physicians, I always ask, “What effect do brain juices (neurotransmitters) have when applied to striated muscle tissue, such as the bicep? They see immediately that voluntary muscle is sympathetic NS controlled, and that addiction is voluntary, purposeful, free-will stupidity.Check out the evidence page for more background on the addictive disease scam:</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><a href='http://www.rational.org/html_public_area/evidence.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.rational.org/html_public_area/evidence.html</a></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I hope you aren’t fronting a pretend disease to your family or to the taxpayers who have to clean up after your messes, especially if you are receiving pretend treatments that cost everyone else lots of money and peace of mind. If you won’t guarantee me, your family, and the world you’ll never drink/use again, then you lack the moral standing for polite company.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Jack Trimpey</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul</title>
		<link>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-56863</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-56863</guid>
					<description>Hi Jack, are you on drugs? Your version of an apology is garbage, sorry, i mean its actually very funny! How can anyone tell someone else how to apologise? Finally, you sound so self righteous....he who has no sin cast the first stone.... As the last comment said....get a life Jack!
&lt;blockquote&gt;Paul,

The fearless moral inventories of 12-step recovery are empty because addicts apologize for  all of their drunken behavior, but carefully avoid responsibility for the act of self-intoxication. The act of self-intoxication is the mother of all moral inventories, a profoundly immoral act causing others pain and suffering and placing everyone at risk.

Human beings must be taught how to apologize, and usually are as children. I have taught children and many adults how to apologize because they dont’t know how to do it. Because you are obviously in recovery, your moral conscience is dormant, and you cannot apologize for your past drinking/using because you reserve the option to have yummy relapses.

Judging the conduct of others is part of personal maturity. In the inverted world of recoveryism, however, moral judgment is loathed in all of its forms because it is in our animal nature to resent social censure of our conduct.

My question, Paul, is what is your plan for the future use of alcohol and other drugs? Are you going to use again in this lifetime, or are not? If you can’t guarantee me and everyone who cares that you’ll never drink again, then you lack to moral standing to comment on this matter.

&lt;em&gt;Get it? &lt;/em&gt;
Jack Trimpey&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jack, are you on drugs? Your version of an apology is garbage, sorry, i mean its actually very funny! How can anyone tell someone else how to apologise? Finally, you sound so self righteous&#8230;.he who has no sin cast the first stone&#8230;. As the last comment said&#8230;.get a life Jack!</p>
<blockquote><p>Paul,</p>
<p>The fearless moral inventories of 12-step recovery are empty because addicts apologize for  all of their drunken behavior, but carefully avoid responsibility for the act of self-intoxication. The act of self-intoxication is the mother of all moral inventories, a profoundly immoral act causing others pain and suffering and placing everyone at risk.</p>
<p>Human beings must be taught how to apologize, and usually are as children. I have taught children and many adults how to apologize because they dont’t know how to do it. Because you are obviously in recovery, your moral conscience is dormant, and you cannot apologize for your past drinking/using because you reserve the option to have yummy relapses.</p>
<p>Judging the conduct of others is part of personal maturity. In the inverted world of recoveryism, however, moral judgment is loathed in all of its forms because it is in our animal nature to resent social censure of our conduct.</p>
<p>My question, Paul, is what is your plan for the future use of alcohol and other drugs? Are you going to use again in this lifetime, or are not? If you can’t guarantee me and everyone who cares that you’ll never drink again, then you lack to moral standing to comment on this matter.</p>
<p><em>Get it? </em><br />
Jack Trimpey</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Finnegan</title>
		<link>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-50061</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-50061</guid>
					<description>Wow!  To hell with Mel... what a great platform to denounce AA and promote ARTV!
Geez, Jack.. Get a life.
Let go of that shit.
&lt;blockquote&gt;Tom,

It’s AVRT, not ARTV. You might also try learning AVRT® and grow up.

Jack Trimpey&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  To hell with Mel&#8230; what a great platform to denounce AA and promote ARTV!<br />
Geez, Jack.. Get a life.<br />
Let go of that shit.</p>
<blockquote><p>Tom,</p>
<p>It’s AVRT, not ARTV. You might also try learning AVRT® and grow up.</p>
<p>Jack Trimpey</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: the Qahal</title>
		<link>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-48589</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-48589</guid>
					<description>Mel Gibson sole purpose for which he was brought into existence is to full fill the word of Yahweh Elohim in the end time , he must also know that nothing that is done by him is of any least significants therefore producing the passion of the (Christ) was apart of his calling  to make known the name of the creator Yahweh and his (ben) Yahshua Ha-Mashiach. This is just the beginning of his purpose for this he will suffer like anyone else who takes the responsibility of proclaiming the truth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mel Gibson sole purpose for which he was brought into existence is to full fill the word of Yahweh Elohim in the end time , he must also know that nothing that is done by him is of any least significants therefore producing the passion of the (Christ) was apart of his calling  to make known the name of the creator Yahweh and his (ben) Yahshua Ha-Mashiach. This is just the beginning of his purpose for this he will suffer like anyone else who takes the responsibility of proclaiming the truth
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Inez Newmann</title>
		<link>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-37218</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-37218</guid>
					<description>Mabey some people like being imorale. Its far more interesting then endless arguing and judgement endured by the likes of RR, AVRT and the 12 steps. Were all animals.....sicka!! Let the unholy battle continue forever and may our victims cry out in anguish  and may the likes of you people get over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mabey some people like being imorale. Its far more interesting then endless arguing and judgement endured by the likes of RR, AVRT and the 12 steps. Were all animals&#8230;..sicka!! Let the unholy battle continue forever and may our victims cry out in anguish  and may the likes of you people get over it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: justice Judge</title>
		<link>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-18845</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-18845</guid>
					<description>In regards to the photo of mel gibson I am just as likely to take a photo of the web pubishes and deface it in the same way in defence. defacing a photo out of hatred is sill desecration. I sentence you to apoligise to Mel and remove this hanious act from the web sight. 
As for the publisher of the blog he has emotional issues conected to his father and should sough help in a thereputic comunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to the photo of mel gibson I am just as likely to take a photo of the web pubishes and deface it in the same way in defence. defacing a photo out of hatred is sill desecration. I sentence you to apoligise to Mel and remove this hanious act from the web sight.<br />
As for the publisher of the blog he has emotional issues conected to his father and should sough help in a thereputic comunity.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve</title>
		<link>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-11702</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 20:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-11702</guid>
					<description>If alcoholism were not a disease then alcohloics could drink in moderation and rationally use their superior logic to control this foe. A great test to see if you have the disease is to go try and drink. If you dont have the disease you will easily be able to stop if not youve got it. It can be held in remission by doing a few simple things but will remain with you forever,hence Mel Gibsons relapse and Robin Wiliams relapse. Its not even a matter of willpower....if you are trying to tell me the guy on the street pushing a supermarket cart willed himself there your simply wrong. By all means if this works for you then keep doing it. But if youve tried and tried to know avail and have reached the end of your will power and human potential then try seeking God. Constant use of any chemical can hardwire you to be an alcoholic...period.So if this fails and you find you need to step out of the battle and let God fight it....go to A.A. If this is working then keep using it.

Sincerely

Steve

&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Steve,

Such pristine logic! Alcoholics are people who drink too much but don’t really love to drink, but drink because they are powerless over their desire to drink resulting from a mysterious, unidentified, incurable disease for which their is no laboratory test, alcoholism. Naturally, alcoholics don’t have favorite drinks because they are just obeying forces beyond their control. People who quit drinking aren’t alcoholics because if they were they wouldn’t have been able to quit. If they were real alcoholics they wouldn’t have been able to quit. If they could‘ve quit, they would‘ve quit, but they didn’t quit, which proves they absolutely cannot quit, and only God can help them.

I’m thinking real hard about this and I think I’m getting it. Maybe some other 12-steppers can illuminate this conundrum.

Jack Trimpey&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If alcoholism were not a disease then alcohloics could drink in moderation and rationally use their superior logic to control this foe. A great test to see if you have the disease is to go try and drink. If you dont have the disease you will easily be able to stop if not youve got it. It can be held in remission by doing a few simple things but will remain with you forever,hence Mel Gibsons relapse and Robin Wiliams relapse. Its not even a matter of willpower&#8230;.if you are trying to tell me the guy on the street pushing a supermarket cart willed himself there your simply wrong. By all means if this works for you then keep doing it. But if youve tried and tried to know avail and have reached the end of your will power and human potential then try seeking God. Constant use of any chemical can hardwire you to be an alcoholic&#8230;period.So if this fails and you find you need to step out of the battle and let God fight it&#8230;.go to A.A. If this is working then keep using it.</p>
<p>Sincerely</p>
<p>Steve</p>
<hr /><br />
<blockquote><p>Steve,</p>
<p>Such pristine logic! Alcoholics are people who drink too much but don’t really love to drink, but drink because they are powerless over their desire to drink resulting from a mysterious, unidentified, incurable disease for which their is no laboratory test, alcoholism. Naturally, alcoholics don’t have favorite drinks because they are just obeying forces beyond their control. People who quit drinking aren’t alcoholics because if they were they wouldn’t have been able to quit. If they were real alcoholics they wouldn’t have been able to quit. If they could‘ve quit, they would‘ve quit, but they didn’t quit, which proves they absolutely cannot quit, and only God can help them.</p>
<p>I’m thinking real hard about this and I think I’m getting it. Maybe some other 12-steppers can illuminate this conundrum.</p>
<p>Jack Trimpey</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-4055</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-4055</guid>
					<description>Thank you Jack Trimpey.  I was in (mostly in) and out of Alanon for 35 years. During a meeting in the mid 1970's a newpaper article was passed around the group.  This was a rare and momentous occassion since only Alanon approved literature was allowed to be read in a meeting. This news was so important that an exception was made.  The article said that the Medical Association (I think it was the AMA) had declared alcoholism to be an actual disease.  I was stunned and perplexed.  About 30 years after well-meaning but mistaken Dr. Silkworth decided it must be a disease the medical community finally agreed.  This reminds of the story about how 3 blindfolded men were sent to define what an elephant is. The one holding the tail said it is like a rope, the one holding a leg said it is like a column, the one holding the trunk said it is like a hose. So of course a man with a medical degree would say alcoholism is a medical problem, a psychologist would say it is a psychological problem, a religious professional,priest or rabbi would say it is a moral problem.

I believe alcoholism and similar addictions have been moral issues from the beginning of human history and still are. When you identify the problem you know where the answer lies. I have attended many open AA meetings, to try to “understand.” AA says their “disease is baffling.” As long as well-meaning but misinformed people try to treat moral problems with medical means they will always be baffled.
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Nancy,

Very well said! Here’s my 2¢.

The clergy, scientists, physicians, psychologists, and three blind men would all agree that addiction is a moral problem if they weren’t swarmed the the mendacious sentimentality of the addiction treatment industry, and its feeder system, the recovery group movement.

As an addicted, licensed professional, I was once convinced that my “alcoholism” was the outcome of physiological and psychological factors. My colleagues had similar beliefs, and so did the various graduate schools we all attended. While I was “in recovery,” i.e., tentatively sober, I “treated” a good number of “alcoholics” and other substance abusers. I dictated clinical notes documenting the backgrounds, clinical planning, and prognosis of people suffering from addictive disease, and when they continued their addiction, as practically all did, I closed their cases and opened new ones. The disease concept of addiction fit me well, so I wore it to work, did my job, and got drunk on weekends.

In 1978, the A.M.A. conceded to an internal special interest group, the “two-hatters” who had received a political rehabilitation throught the disease concept of addiction, and merely endorsed the proposition that alcoholism is a disease. For thirty years, they had acknowledged AA’s “religious solution” without endorsing it, but the stench of money finally overtook their scientific and moral forethought. Brought to a floor vote, the “ayes” won, just as that annual conference was ending. Although science isn’t democratic, the A.M.A. has permitted the illusion to continue, that the incurable, insurable disease of alcoholism/addiction may be treated medically, just as cancer, diabetes, and multiple schlerosis and other chronic diseases are treated. For a discussion of that, &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.rational.org/blog/8/&quot;&gt;read this blog.&lt;/a&gt;

My point is that the medical profession, which enjoys the greatest benefits of its powerful role in society, is also most liable for the iatrogenic nightmare they have loosed upon America and the rest of the world. While most believe that the recovery group movement is expanding to keep up with mass, runaway addiction to alcohol and other drugs, that is simply one more inversion added to the comprehensive inversion of reality created by the disease concept of immorality.

Jack Trimpey&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Jack Trimpey.  I was in (mostly in) and out of Alanon for 35 years. During a meeting in the mid 1970&#8217;s a newpaper article was passed around the group.  This was a rare and momentous occassion since only Alanon approved literature was allowed to be read in a meeting. This news was so important that an exception was made.  The article said that the Medical Association (I think it was the AMA) had declared alcoholism to be an actual disease.  I was stunned and perplexed.  About 30 years after well-meaning but mistaken Dr. Silkworth decided it must be a disease the medical community finally agreed.  This reminds of the story about how 3 blindfolded men were sent to define what an elephant is. The one holding the tail said it is like a rope, the one holding a leg said it is like a column, the one holding the trunk said it is like a hose. So of course a man with a medical degree would say alcoholism is a medical problem, a psychologist would say it is a psychological problem, a religious professional,priest or rabbi would say it is a moral problem.</p>
<p>I believe alcoholism and similar addictions have been moral issues from the beginning of human history and still are. When you identify the problem you know where the answer lies. I have attended many open AA meetings, to try to “understand.” AA says their “disease is baffling.” As long as well-meaning but misinformed people try to treat moral problems with medical means they will always be baffled.<br />
<hr /></p>
<blockquote><p>Nancy,</p>
<p>Very well said! Here’s my 2¢.</p>
<p>The clergy, scientists, physicians, psychologists, and three blind men would all agree that addiction is a moral problem if they weren’t swarmed the the mendacious sentimentality of the addiction treatment industry, and its feeder system, the recovery group movement.</p>
<p>As an addicted, licensed professional, I was once convinced that my “alcoholism” was the outcome of physiological and psychological factors. My colleagues had similar beliefs, and so did the various graduate schools we all attended. While I was “in recovery,” i.e., tentatively sober, I “treated” a good number of “alcoholics” and other substance abusers. I dictated clinical notes documenting the backgrounds, clinical planning, and prognosis of people suffering from addictive disease, and when they continued their addiction, as practically all did, I closed their cases and opened new ones. The disease concept of addiction fit me well, so I wore it to work, did my job, and got drunk on weekends.</p>
<p>In 1978, the A.M.A. conceded to an internal special interest group, the “two-hatters” who had received a political rehabilitation throught the disease concept of addiction, and merely endorsed the proposition that alcoholism is a disease. For thirty years, they had acknowledged AA’s “religious solution” without endorsing it, but the stench of money finally overtook their scientific and moral forethought. Brought to a floor vote, the “ayes” won, just as that annual conference was ending. Although science isn’t democratic, the A.M.A. has permitted the illusion to continue, that the incurable, insurable disease of alcoholism/addiction may be treated medically, just as cancer, diabetes, and multiple schlerosis and other chronic diseases are treated. For a discussion of that, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.rational.org/blog/8/">read this blog.</a></p>
<p>My point is that the medical profession, which enjoys the greatest benefits of its powerful role in society, is also most liable for the iatrogenic nightmare they have loosed upon America and the rest of the world. While most believe that the recovery group movement is expanding to keep up with mass, runaway addiction to alcohol and other drugs, that is simply one more inversion added to the comprehensive inversion of reality created by the disease concept of immorality.</p>
<p>Jack Trimpey</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Carl</title>
		<link>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-2820</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 09:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-2820</guid>
					<description>Jack, I fail to understand the reasoning behind the attacks bought on by 'name'. You discovered a method of halting self destructive behavior and published it, in hopes that it may help someone else to better their life and the lives of their family members. Why would anyone attack a person that is merely offering - not forcing - their experience to those who seek to learn from it?

I tried the AA way. I left every meeting with the intense desire to drink - a complete flip from the desire to be sober that led me to the meeting mere hours earlier.
The stories of devastating failure and painful struggles within from the members around the room only deepened my feelings that I was doomed to fail, and therefore, must be a failure. I was a daily drinker for many, many years. I felt lonely and misunderstood, feeling that no-one could know how strong the pull of alcohol was. All day long while at work I would tell myself &quot;I'm NOT going to stop at the liquor store on the way home, I don't want to&quot;. Sure enough, I would end up in the drive thru lane feeling like a failure. The dismal thought of attending an AA meeting instead only added stress, which I counteracted with another drink. How sad!

After searching for a better way by researching my 'hopeless disease' online (online learning - which I just learned is another disease - Ha!), I came across your website and a HUGE weight lifted from my shoulders. I clicked my way to success in mere minutes by reading your FREE web pages about the addictive voice and the basic animal desire to feel good (I called it 'numb') and relaxed. I instantly saw what I knew all along. I was the reason that glass kept being refilled. Wow... Just imagine! It's been a while since it had a drink. Not counting the days, weeks or months as there's no need. It's something silly I used to let happen.

Please don't let a few insecure people get to you. They are clearly angered that there is a simple way to stop what they have worked SO hard to justify. It must turn their world upside down.

One more thing — THANK YOU, more than you will EVER know!
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Carl,&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;You made my day!&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Jack Trimpey  &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, I fail to understand the reasoning behind the attacks bought on by &#8216;name&#8217;. You discovered a method of halting self destructive behavior and published it, in hopes that it may help someone else to better their life and the lives of their family members. Why would anyone attack a person that is merely offering - not forcing - their experience to those who seek to learn from it?</p>
<p>I tried the AA way. I left every meeting with the intense desire to drink - a complete flip from the desire to be sober that led me to the meeting mere hours earlier.<br />
The stories of devastating failure and painful struggles within from the members around the room only deepened my feelings that I was doomed to fail, and therefore, must be a failure. I was a daily drinker for many, many years. I felt lonely and misunderstood, feeling that no-one could know how strong the pull of alcohol was. All day long while at work I would tell myself &#8220;I&#8217;m NOT going to stop at the liquor store on the way home, I don&#8217;t want to&#8221;. Sure enough, I would end up in the drive thru lane feeling like a failure. The dismal thought of attending an AA meeting instead only added stress, which I counteracted with another drink. How sad!</p>
<p>After searching for a better way by researching my &#8216;hopeless disease&#8217; online (online learning - which I just learned is another disease - Ha!), I came across your website and a HUGE weight lifted from my shoulders. I clicked my way to success in mere minutes by reading your FREE web pages about the addictive voice and the basic animal desire to feel good (I called it &#8216;numb&#8217;) and relaxed. I instantly saw what I knew all along. I was the reason that glass kept being refilled. Wow&#8230; Just imagine! It&#8217;s been a while since it had a drink. Not counting the days, weeks or months as there&#8217;s no need. It&#8217;s something silly I used to let happen.</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t let a few insecure people get to you. They are clearly angered that there is a simple way to stop what they have worked SO hard to justify. It must turn their world upside down.</p>
<p>One more thing — THANK YOU, more than you will EVER know!</p>
<blockquote><hr /><em>Carl,</em></p>
<p><em>You made my day!</em></p>
<p><em>Jack Trimpey  </em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sunshine</title>
		<link>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-2738</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 22:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rational.org/blog/26/#comment-2738</guid>
					<description>I am living proof that AA doesn't work.  I will never drink and never change my mind.  I do not have to hide at AA meetings to cover my shame on one day at a time recovery...rehashing the past...hoping the cravings go away...reminded one day at a time what a loser I am in a room full of drunken sot losers.  I was embarassed to be associated with such mind altering &quot;truths&quot; as we read out loud the excuses of our illness.  It is truly a God-less group of mind twisting amorals.  I have regained my moral standing in one decision.  Oh sweet freedom...the truth has set me free. How could a person (who shouldn't drink) see drinking as anything less than a immoral action?  It is a sick, disgusting, act against life itself.  Jack, I believe God brought me to your website as living proof that there is truth in AVRT.  AA is truly a scourge to mankind.  How sad for all the victims.  If you see this get out NOW...save yourself years of misery and wasted time.  Join the living.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am living proof that AA doesn&#8217;t work.  I will never drink and never change my mind.  I do not have to hide at AA meetings to cover my shame on one day at a time recovery&#8230;rehashing the past&#8230;hoping the cravings go away&#8230;reminded one day at a time what a loser I am in a room full of drunken sot losers.  I was embarassed to be associated with such mind altering &#8220;truths&#8221; as we read out loud the excuses of our illness.  It is truly a God-less group of mind twisting amorals.  I have regained my moral standing in one decision.  Oh sweet freedom&#8230;the truth has set me free. How could a person (who shouldn&#8217;t drink) see drinking as anything less than a immoral action?  It is a sick, disgusting, act against life itself.  Jack, I believe God brought me to your website as living proof that there is truth in AVRT.  AA is truly a scourge to mankind.  How sad for all the victims.  If you see this get out NOW&#8230;save yourself years of misery and wasted time.  Join the living.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
