|
Rational Recovery Discussion Forums
![]() Open Forum
![]() Deconstructing AA
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Deconstructing AA |
|
Buttercup Member |
Lately, I've been taking a real good look at the very center-piece of the recovery program of Alcoholics Anonymous: the (in)famous Twelve Steps. Here they are: quote:Let's zero in on Step Seven: "Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings". Just what, exactly, are we trying to accomplish here? Sounds a lot like asking for perfection doesn't it? (Just how does one "humbly" ask God to make one perfect? ) On page 76 of the "Big Book", we are instructed as to how to do a Seventh Step: quote:Indeed, we did pray for a state of perfection or near-perfection. Now take a look at Step Ten: "Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it" Just what is that doing in there?(!) Since God has taken away all our defects of character, what is there left to inventory? The inventory's empty, isn't it? Was this just a meaningless throw-away step so they wouldn't have to call it the Eleven Steps? Or do they mean it? The very first paragraph after the introduction of the Twelve Steps (pg. 60, "Big Book"): quote:See? They admit it: THE SEVENTH STEP DOES NOT WORK! If the step doesn't work, by their own admission, then why bother doing it? So we can get rid of Step Seven. This, in turn, renders irrelevant our being "entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character" since He's not going to do it anyway: ready or not. So we can eliminate Step Six. Of course, now we don't have to make a "searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves" since the purpose of that was to identify all those "defects of character" for future removal. Step Four: Hasta la vista, baby! Step Five is now rendered null and void as we no loonger know the "exact nature of our wrongs". How about that! I just ditched four steps, and cut a considerable amount of dead wood right out of "The Program". Now all that remains is what to do about this revelation. Should I write to Alcoholics Anonymous World Services? They just put out the Fourth Edition of the "Big Book" so it might not be another fifteen years or so before they introduce the Fifth Edition with the new, streamlined Eight Step program. Perhaps I should write my own version? Hey, I even have a snappy title for it: Buttercup's Big Book: The Easier, Softer Way Damn, sometimes I impress even myself. [This message has been edited by Buttercup (edited 09-23-2002).] IP: Logged |
|
Jill Member |
Buttercup, I really like what you wrote about the "12 steps" I think that anyone reading these would recognize that they are religous ideas. The problem with AA is in how they deny that it is religous. The larger problem is that people can be compelled by a court to attend religous meetings, and told that AA is the only way. As far as I am concerned folks should have the right to practice all 12 steps if that is their choice. I just want to be free not to do so. I sometimes describe my success with AVRT as being a "one step" process. IP: Logged |
|
Buttercup Member |
To Jill: AA is despicable in more ways than I can count. However, let us never forget that the A Number One problem with AA is that their program does not work. Even that would be bad enough, but they make matters worse. The Steps are nonsense, and, yet what happens when someone sincerely approaches AA for help? When they dry out, and can think clearly again, and their intellectual, religious, and/or moral integrity tells them that AA isn't for them, what happens? Do these folks, in their lovingkindness, say: "We're sorry to see you leave the Fellowship. Perhaps it isn't for you afterall. If you don't want our help, please get help somewhere, and in the mean time, please don't drink"? Do they say something like that? HELL NO! Instead they claim that he's in "denial" (a term from pop-psychology you won't find anywhere in the "Big Book") that he needs to go out and "hit his bottom", so that when he returns (assuming he doesn't drink himself to death) he can get "humble" and "honest". Between the ideology of "powerlessness", and the claim that those who don't "make it" are constitutionally incapable of being honest with themselves, and that they are born that way, AA inevitably turns mild drinking problems into severe ones. These people have blood on their hands. And all the while, they claim that the "Program" relieves them of all selfishness and self-seeking. AA's attrition exceeds that of the Bataan Death March, with a recidivism rate of at least 91% or more. When they either outright kill someone, or some old-timer "goes back out", they simply say: "Some must die so the rest may live" - How utterly cold-blooded! Such a nice spirituality! I've seen plenty of web sites that attack the Steps, but always one at a time. AFAIC, this isn't good enough, since the stepper confronted with this kind of attack will simply give the stock answer: "You're in denial, and need to get honest". It's a whole 'nother story to demonstrate that the Steps, taken as a whole, are self-contradictory. Demonstrating the absurdity of the system, as a whole, will do more to help ex-steppers get over any RGDs they may still have, it gives the readers of these forums more potent ammo to fire at AA whenever some celeb makes some maudlin tribute to the "Steps". And it might actually help some steppers as they now no longer have to fool with the most dangerous ones. Playing with the Fourth and Fifth Steps, this amateur psychology, is playing with fire. Those "fearless moral inventories" are the prime cause of "going back out", can lead to severe depression, and have even been known to lead to suicide. This type of introspection is best handled under the care of a professional, and not some dumbass sponsor you met in some meeting. Perhaps the stepper who's being pressured to do a Fourth Step inventory, against his better judgement, will gain the courage to tell his sponsor to shove it after reading this thread. Even better, he'd see just what a steaming, stinking pile of poo AA really is, and would take the Crash Course instead of going back to AA. In any event, my good deed for the day.
[This message has been edited by Buttercup (edited 09-24-2002).] IP: Logged |
|
LCFREE Member |
Buttercup, In Jack Trimpey's first book, "The Small Book", there is a great discussion of the balderdash that is the 12-step program. Although Jack no longer advocates "The Small Book" due to its reliance on RET as a technique to achieve abstinence, I find the AA step discussion still has great validity. Given your recent experience, you might find it especially pertinent. Whenever the beast throws up those niggling thoughts of (Hey, maybe AA is right and you DO have a disease) I re-read that section. You also might find Ken Ragge's, "The Real AA" extremely interesting. Good reading! L. IP: Logged |
|
Buttercup Member |
To LCFREE: I'll do just that. Thanks. IP: Logged |
|
quizmnw Member |
Hey Buttercup, the 12step program was good where it began in a religous program. I think it originated from an Oxford organization. That's where it should have stayed and not over-complicating it with addiction recovery. I guess the guys who wrote the "big book" initially had good intentions but they forgot or didn't realize that everybody is not religious and that there is nothing spiritual with substance addiction. IP: Logged |
|
quizmnw Member |
I'm sorry that message was meant for LCFREE. IP: Logged |
|
Panther Member |
quote:
When I was in aa I did read a lot about the beginings of this insidious fellowship, quite an interesting story if you research a bunch of books and connect the dots. One common thread, no where was the word QUIT in any of the aa books or literature. It seems the 12 steppers recoil from the word QUIT like it was a hot flame. I mentioned the word QUIT in an aa meeting discussion one time and the looks I received were down right nasty. After the meeting I was chastised by an aa elder and promptly told that "we alcoholics" can't quit, we can only arrest our disease one day at a time by working a good program, turening over our will to our higher power and attending aa meetings. At the time I felt very small, but deep down I sensed soemthing was wrong with the picture, unfortunately for me I spent another 8 months in aa before I discoverd AVRT and finally QUIT drinking alcohol for the rest of my life and QUIT attending aa 12 step cult meetings. Talk about freedom! IP: Logged |
|
Jo Member |
Panther, Good to see your posts and how are you! I still think that profit or not, Bill and Bob were still were in the grip of a religious fervour after being exposed to the Oxford Group. It's a very heady mix, religion and profit, similar to politics. Buttercup, She was absolutely fanatical about the steps, but her own personal life was crazy - I found out that she was a single woman who had been "sober" for 10 years and had 2 children by different men in the program, the latest of whom she had said was not living up to his responsibilities and was still sick because he "didn't get it (the program)." I was amazed at her contempt for established religions like Catholics, Baptists etc. None of this (her situation) mattered to her fanatical brain, only "sober time" mattered plus she seemed quite conscientious with her children. She constantly told me what was wrong with my thinking and that if I didn't change I would drink again - for sure! Nothing about me was positive to her. I actually ended up feeling sorry for her and tried not to judge her according to my beliefs. This woman had a lot of prestige in the AA program! Her personal problems were considered part of the "disease of alcoholism" rather than her own bad choices! IP: Logged |
|
Panther Member |
quote: Jo, I've been good, thanks for asking. A close friend of mine just recently read the New Cure and made a BP. He was a long time drinking buddy of mine back in the day, we kind of drifted apart over the past couple of years (since I made my BP), but out of the blue he calls and tells me he wants to do something about his drinking habit, he wants my help he says, he was contemplating going to rehab. Of course I offer no help in my usual manner. LOL He read the book and made a BP and now it is up to him, I explained AVRT to him and he seems to have a good grasp of the technique since reading the book. I am sincerely happy for him. I was at a HS football game the other night and seen an old aa elder that I hung around with while I was attending aa. I walked the other way to avoid contact. It was a very akward encounter, and I have been feeling a bunch of RGD since then, I am approaching that magical aa sobriety date, I can't seem to shake this RGD feeling. Real funny, not beast attacks to drink, but a real blah mood and a lot of remembering back to when I was fully entrapped in aa-12 step and how that time period was so strange and how I bought into the 12 step crap. Well a beautiful fall day, good to see you around. IP: Logged |
|
Buttercup Member |
To Jo: Your description of your AA sponsor is quite typical. I've seen lots of that type, both male and female. It hardly comes as a surprise, if you'll check out my introductory post. The Twelve Steps are nonsensical, and everyone knows it. There is no way that anyone could make themselves believe that without there being repercussions. Once one has so short-circuited their ability to think about this logically, the effects can't just be limited to AA doctrines. It will affect every other aspect of their lives. Also, it doesn't amaze me in the least that she would also hold other religions in such contempt. The teachings of the Catholics, Baptists, other Protestants, Islam, and every other major world religion, and a good deal of the minor ones as well, directly contradict the religion of AA. Christians generally hold that God has given man the gift of freewill. Therefore, if you engage in activities like drinking and drugging, and develop an addiction, that was an act of freewill. It is not God's doing, but yours and yours alone; therefore, getting and staying sober isn't God's responsibility, but yours and yours alone. Also, the Christian God doesn't grant miracles on request, he doesn't give the Christian his daily "marching orders", and this business of asking for nothing less than perfection would be considered a form of blasphemy. After all, according to the Christian, there was but one "perfect man": Jesus Christ, the very son of God himself, and there will never be another. The religion of AA doesn't mix well with any other. If you have any doubts that AA is a cult, take a look at this: quote:That is the original version of Step 12. Notice that the AA is to "carry this message" to everyone, to "alcoholics" preferentially, but not exclusively! Later versions were edited so as to more carefully conceal the cult nature of "The Program". This little bit of intellectual dishonesty has served AA quite well indeed. As a result, AAs tend to be a very squirrelly bunch. They say that your choices are AA or to "remain in the disease". From what I've seen of AAs, I'd rather take my chances with the disease. [This message has been edited by Buttercup (edited 10-20-2002).] IP: Logged |
|
quizmnw Member |
quote: Hey Panther thanx for breaking that down for me. I didn't know those two Dr.Jerks' were in it solely for the money at desperate addicts expense. You learn something every day!! IP: Logged |
|
Jo Member |
Panther, I know what you mean about walking the other way. There is an alanon lady who goes to my church. Unfortunately, she remembered me. She cornered me one day after church and began talking "alaspeak" with very pious overtones (they are worse than AAers). It was so utterly pathetic and boring. I thought to myself "This is all people in the 12 step program can talk about with each other" It's so meaningless to anyone but another stepper. If RGD means I wanted to get out of there as quickly as possible and not get any on me, then I guess I'm suffering from RGD too. I learned my lesson and the next time she approached me, I made my excuses abruptly and said, "Have a nice day!" I've been pretty busy with my courses lately. This is the first weekend that I've been posting for awhile. It's great. I love being a student again and it's great being in charge of your own life. Buttercup, IP: Logged |
|
Carefree Member |
The only steps that have any kind of validity, or make any real sense, are # 8, 9 & 10: 8. Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all. These steps effectively just say: 'Ok, now that you've sobered up and wised up, see if there is any mess that you caused while you were acting like an a***hole that you can clean up. But remember that sometimes "Least said, soonest mended" is the best policy, and that actions speak louder than words. And learn from the experience.' As these are the normal actions of any reasonable, self-respecting person, I fail to see why anyone should need to lay them out as three, pretentiously worded, steps. IP: Logged |
|
michael9810 unregistered |
Buttercup, AA's Step 7 is a prayer of intercession, and is firmly within the Christian tradition. Your premises are factually incorrect, so it's hard to know what point you're actually trying to make ... Perhaps you're suggesting that we join you in the barren wilderness of Atheism? Please clarify. M. IP: Logged |
|
Admin5 Administrator |
I am hereby nominating Bill W and Dr. Bob for admission to the Rube Goldberg Hall of Fame. http://www.rube-goldberg.com/html/gallery.htm
IP: Logged |
|
Awakened Member |
I live in a very small town, and so it is unavoidable that I run into & see people from my AA (former) group. And it is always difficult. Part of "me" wants to believe in the unconditional (bullshit) "LOVE". But, the RATIONAL part of me realizes that they are "wolves in sheeps clothing." They care nothing about you/me as individuals, only as converts. I understand your RGD. Find out who you are and be yourself, with your own self-defined goals. I'm new to this forum, so I've probably borrowed or plaglarized a bit ( from Mr. Trimpey). Thanks for your consideration. AW IP: Logged |
|
Eskimo Member |
quote: Omygosh....is that an issue? I have to be honest, I have more than plagiarized from << I have directly stole>> -- Idea's, words, thoughts,and wisdom from Mr T on several occasions. And if I'm being REALLY honest...also Panther, Phil, Pokey, Clearscreen, Bronwyn, India, Redsoap and others as well...........me bad -E IP: Logged |
|
steeev Member |
Hey panther..........I was driving today and a guy has an easy does it sticker. After almost keeling over from laughing i ended up next to him in traffic. Gave him a thumbs up.........if he only knew what the thumb ment..................lol IP: Logged |
|
Buttercup Member |
Carefree wrote: quote: In the first place, these steps are all part and parcel of AA's great mind game. The very idea that you can not stay sober unless you "clean house" is utterly bogus. It's simply seeking some "deep" reason for self-destructive drinking. It's an evasion of the truth: drinkers drink because it makes them feel real good all over. I never drank for any other reason. Period. Unless one comes to terms with this fact, there's not one damn thing that you can do about the problem. Furthermore, this idea of "cleaning house" plays straight into the favor of the Beast-within. The lurking doubt that one may have somehow failed to make some amend for something one did while drunk provides a ready excuse to drink whenever one pleases. And there's the built-in excuse: didn't work the "Steps" well enough. (Is there ever such a thing?) Instead of receiving admonitions for being st00pid, Mr. Alcoholic can go right back to the "Rooms" for another dose of acceptance and lovingkindness. Mr. Beast has got to love that! In most cases, for most drunks, the one and only "amend" that counts is abstainance. The drunk's family probably doesn't give a damn about anything else, and any other attempt at "amends" won't cut the mustard. So far as "...these are the normal actions of any reasonable, self-respecting person...", like hell they are. I never met any normal, self-respecting person who continually wallowed in such self-doubt and angst. Show me someone who "Continue[s] to take personal inventory and when [...] wrong promptly admitte[s] it", and I'll show you a doormat. Thanks, but no thanks! Michael9810 wrote: quote: Read the original post that opened this thread. Then show me what "premises" are "factually incorrect". For the most part, I was quoting the words right out of the "Big Book". They can't be factually incorrect unless it's your contention that the "Big Book" doesn't really say what it means. In which case, what good is it? As for Step 7 being a prayer for intercession, read it again, and read what Bill Wilson wrote as a model Seventh Step prayer. That's a prayer for perfection, and that is most certainly not Christian. Furthermore, there's nothing "Christian" about the Steps or AA.
quote: Can you say: "Fearless moral inventory?" Sure, I knew you could. quote: "Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others." quote: "Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it." There's your true origins of the Steps: straight from a training manual for the aspiring Black Magician! Make no mistake about this: Bill Wilson was up to his eyeballs in the Occult. He fancied himself as a Black Magician, a Warlock, and went to great lengths to convince others that he indeed was: that he gave sobriety and he could take it away. That's how he got away with stealing the copyright to the "Big Book" with nary a peep of protest. It's AA's dirty little secret. IP: Logged |
|
bettermom Member |
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Buttercup: I never met any normal, self-respecting person who continually wallowed in such self-doubt and angst. Show me someone who "Continue[s] to take personal inventory and when [...] wrong promptly admitte[s] it", and I'll show you a doormat. Buttercup, This is so true. If my sister tries to make amends to me one more time I think I'll flip. Just stop relapsing please and that will be sufficient. I can't stand to be around her when she's in "recovey" mode, constantly pointing out all of her faults and "character defects". My two sisters are completely 12-step whipped and I really don't know how to react to them anymore. They are so brainwashed I fear I'll never get them back.
IP: Logged |
|
BeastMistress Member |
And does anybody consider how spooky it is to get an anonymous or otherwise unexplained apology? I once represented a very spooky criminal defendant -- his crime was minor, but he manifested highly pathological behaviors, including stalking me and a couple of witnesses. Several months after he was released from jail I got a phone call, out of the blue, "apologizing" for "anything he might have done." No explanation. Took a while to figure out he was probably in some sort of AA thing and I was part of his moral inventory. Thanks, but no thanks. Would have been a lot more peaceful if he'd kept his thoughts to himself. IP: Logged |
|
mikeylikesit Member |
I remember when I was still involved and struggling with AA, a gentleman in one of the meetings asked if he could speak to me. I had no idea what he could have wanted. We never spoke to each other or socialized. I knew his first name, and that was only because he would "share" all the time. After the meeting, and with great remorse and trepidation on his part, he apologized to me. He said he had a resentment against me for some time now. Apparently, he thought I was a little stand-offish towards him, and it really bugged him. I asked him why he felt the need to apologize to me, particularly since I knew nothing of his resentment, and was never harmed by it!?! He said that after talking with his sponsor about it, it was determined that he had harmed me spiritually, and that is why he needed to make the amends. Hello!!!! What kind of sick shit is that?? This poor chump is so powerful in his thoughts, that apparently, he can harm me spiritually!!! When I think back on stuff like that, I either laugh, or drop to my knees and thank Ala I got out of AA with my sanity intact. Sometimes both.!! [This message has been edited by mikeylikesit (edited 10-13-2003).] IP: Logged |
|
michael9810 unregistered |
Buttercup, You really should re-read your post, the thinking is notably clumsy. You develop this addled concept of 'perfection' (YOUR term), then inexplicably ascribe it to AA's Step 7. This false premise leads you to engage in several low-watt thought experiments -- including the supposed contradiction between God and prayer, thanks for clearing that up for us -- which Anyway, we might charitably say that your post is topically better suited to some junior college philosophy course than to serious criticism of Alcoholics Anonymous or its 12 Steps. M. IP: Logged |
|
redsoaptree Member |
quote: Michael, I thought to re-read your post again to try and figure out what you're trying to say, but decided it wasn't worth the effort. [This message has been edited by redsoaptree (edited 10-19-2003).] IP: Logged |
|
michael9810 unregistered |
Redsoaptree, Personal religious and philosophical belief isn't really the issue here. Buttercup's intent is to "deconstruct" the 12 Steps, while mine is to offer the criticism that her conclusions are based on false premises, e.g. the absurd handling of Step 7 and HER concept of perfection. You might want to develop further the idea that the Steps are actually hurdles to sobriety ... I think this argument is seriously flawed, but I would welcome more on the topic from you. M.
IP: Logged |
|
whatsinaname Member |
quote: The Steps are not a hurdle to sobriety. They actually facilitate it. In 12-Step philosophy, the term "sobriety" refers to a state in which one is tentatively between bouts of drinking/using. The goal is to remain in this state one-day-at-a-time for life. However, the Steps are a definite hurdle to permanent abstinence; a state in which one refrains deliberately, confidently from indulging the natural appetite for acohol/drug-induced pleasure. This is a common reality acknowledged even by AA itself. [This message has been edited by whatsinaname (edited 10-20-2003).] IP: Logged |
|
Kosh Member |
Buttercup, you can trim them even further than that. Take a look at step 3 again: 3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him. Once that's done, you have NO further control over your own actions. The other 9 steps become moot, as "God" is supposed to do everything for you from that point on, so why are they there? Just 2 short sentences, and the 12 steps are cut by 75%, just like that! How much "softer" or "easier" can the 12 steps get? :-) L8r. IP: Logged |
|
Admin5 Administrator |
All, AVRT is a seminal idea that prompts striking insights into the nature of addiction and recovery. I think the most striking insight comes from the recognition that every single word of official doctrine, and every word spoken in meetings, fits the definition of the Addictive Voice, “Any thinking that supports or suggests the possible future use of alcohol or other drugs.“ Try it. Think back to meetings you’ve been to. Was there ever a word of encouragement that you might ever feel free of impending, catastrophic relapse? By “free,” I don’t just mean “momentarily protected,” but really free, as a normal person with the moral integrity to abstain under all conditions. Read through the "Big Book" of Alcoholics Anonymous, and see if you can find any guidance that would allow you to lead a self-directed life, seeking self-defined goals, free from impending doom. There are a few isolated words, i.e., “recovered,” which may appear, but these are so overwhelmingly contradicted by the disease/powerless concepts, that they stand with no meaning, almost as off-hand errors. All of which leads to the disturbing conclusion that the 12-step fellowship is animated by the persistent desire to continue, not to quit altogether, the use of alcohol and other drugs. Thus, my frequent references to the Fellowship of the Beast, and to AA as the embodiment of the Beast, as the social manifestation of addiction, as addiction’s proxy, or as the purgatory of indecision. The 12-steps were allegedly transmitted from the netherworld to Bill W via automatic handwriting, while he was in a beatific trance. Behold, when he awakened, was a tablet of paper, not stone this time, inscribed with the 12 commandements of AA, commonly known as “suggestions.” See Pass It On for more details about Bill and Lois Wilsons‘ weekend channelling sessions during which the dead paid social visits to their little house parties. Nut case of not, Bill W was in that exquisite condition we call “all Beast," as he built the house of addiction, Alcoholics Anonymous. The vexing thing we have all experienced, even Snooty Michael, is that the Addictive Voice feels like me! Recognizing the Addictive Voice from within the bubble of addiction is like trying to look unaided at our own eyes. Bill W was in the bubble, I guarantee you all, when he conceived of a plan to replace his own moral judgment with adult supervision and quasi-religious piety. There is simply no way that tentatively “sober, one-day-at-a-time,” addicted people can devise a way to defeat addiction. It’s the blind leading the blind, and when seeing a substance abuse counselor, it’s the blind paying the blind. Only when we have a foil for the Addictive Voice, the definition/filter that allows objectification, can we finally shift from the eyes of the Beast to our own rounder, human eyes, and shift from the Beast’s narrow spectrum of feeling to the glorious rainbows of human emotion. Bill W never had that advantage, and he remained depressed, still seeking a “cure” for addiction in other drugs, until his death from addiction related causes. He was truly a pathetic man, an itinerant sociopath, from what I have read of him, yet his pilgrim’s tale has enchanted a nation wishing to turn away from the ugliness of addiction to see its multi-colored coat, with disease victims, scientists toiling in their laboratories, physicians comforting the ill, sensitive couselors as beacons of hope, astute politicians with messages of hope for the afflicted, compassionate families who pray for their diseased members, and of course that band of selfless, grateful, altruists who simply want to tell others their own stories of redemption and newfound humility as a way of staying sober, one-day-at-a-time, themselves. Granted, the friendly face of the Beast isn’t as ugly as the sillier one seen through the lens of AVRT. Thus disguised, the bureaucratic Beast can run freely in society, appearing to be a harbinger of hope for the addicted masses and their families, while it creates conditions perfect for mass, runaway addiction to alcohol and other drugs. Once seen and exposed, however, the Beast is neutralized, and its influence is limited to the perimeters set by standards of decency. The Addictive Voice is the code of the Beast. Likewise, the 12-step program is the code of the Beast, pure and simple. To take portions of it out of that context, seeking to find some redeeming value, is futile. To review Bill W’s life or “early AA,” in an attempt to find a better or kinder version of what we see today, is also futile, for reasons evident in Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, the “sponsor’s manual” that confidently predicts exactly what we see in today’s addiction treatment industry. AA was rotten when it crawled out of the gutter in Akron, and hasn’t change a single scale on its back since then. Jack Trimpey IP: Logged |
|
Kosh Member |
Jack, that's perfect! :-) Rube Goldberg sums up AA to a T. I second the motion. L8r. IP: Logged |
|
michael9810 unregistered |
Jack, You really should get to more meetings, if only for research purposes. Your spiel is well rehearsed, but your rendering of AA and its membership is pure fantasy. Excepting the board's cadre of fawning sycophants, Rational Recovery's audience appears limited. I suppose shock sells, but I wonder how many readers you've FAILED to reach as a result of all this posturing and deception. M. IP: Logged |
|
pookey Member |
Michael 9810. You write very well. Why don't you simply borrow Jack's book from your local library and read it, disregarding what you percieve as AA bashing. I would be most interested on your views of AVRT, and the concept of "The Beast". Do you think that alcoholism is a disease? IP: Logged |
|
whatsinaname Member |
quote: You're correct. But with a lot of hard work, this'll change for the better. People need to know they can quit addiction without fear of their own urges and with conviction of their own God-given willpower. No one's impressed by your bullying here. You don't even bother to cloak your intentions with intellect anymore. Predictably, you've reduced yourself to name-calling. Thats ok.. others do it here, too. They're just more honest about it. Your last post is a good example of 12-Step hypocrisy. IP: Logged |
|
Kosh Member |
Michael, exactly what is it that Jack's writing that you believe to be fantasy and deception? You don't need to go to meetings to know that AA's a crock of shit. All you need is the ability to read and 2 functioning brain cells. I haven't even been to a single 12 step meeting in my life, I'm not planning to any time soon, but I've read AA cover to cover, AA's and AlAnon's 12 and 12 cover to cover, NA cover to cover, OA cover to cover, RR: TNC cover to cover, The Small Book and Taming the Feast Beast cover to cover, I've researched the issue for the past 2 1/2 YEARS, reading everything that I can on the subject, both for and against, including the addiction news groups, too many web pages to count, including some which don't exist any more (sadly), and even read through the AA site and the AA Grapevine site, I've spoken with people who are currently active in AA to get their take, and EVERYTHING that I've read and heard on the subject has lead me to one inescapable conclusion - AA, and every other group that "has nothing to do with AA, but is based on the same 12 steps, traditions, and concepts", is nothing but a seriously deranged religious cult. Quite frankly, I don't see how it can possibly be denied by anyone who has any real knowledge about the subject at all. All I did when I read my materials was drop all the baggage that comes with it and read it as though it was any other book, fiction or not, without any of the "chosen one" BS that's usually attached to religious texts, and interpreted everything as it was written, not "how it's meant to be read" by the believers. As far as I'm concerned, Jack and all the others who believe that AA and other groups of its ilk should be attacked without mercy have it dead on. The 12 step programs are nothing but a menace to the world, and the sooner they're eradicated, the better. L8r. IP: Logged |
|
Admin5 Administrator |
All, I have been very kind to Michael. I have tried to get him to participate constructively in this BBS, and I have also tried to get him to come to terms with his difficulties surrounding the subjects of addiction and recovery. For a while I hoped he would come around, offering good counterpoint for the polemics we enjoy here. No dice, he folds on close contact debate, then withdraws and ambushes someone else. I have persuaded and cajoled, and occasionally called him out on his reason for visiting this BBS. He hasn’t answered, and he continues to post juvenile taunts toward me, and to pose faux intellect when others attempt to contribute their ideas on AVRT-based recovery or 12-step criticism. He reminds me very much of the class clown who teases the class with funny faces while the teacher’s back is turned, and then makes snide, sidelong remarks when disciplined. Michael isn’t sincere. Lately, I've decided he isn’t even nice, although he did strain to show some degree of decency early on. He really doesn’t want to contribute anything, nor does he want to learn. He pretends to be above AA, merely a wise intellect who can, like famous persons past, see profound good and wisdom in the 12-step movement, and of course sees only a cheap facade of verbiage in AVRT-based recovery. My apologies for procrastinating the dismissal of Michael from this BBS. Michael has been rocketed back into the state of limbo from whence he came. Goodby, Michael. You will not be missed, unless I'm missing something. Jack Trimpey IP: Logged |
|
pookey Member |
As well, I thought that twelve steppers had "no opinion on outside issues". A little rule stretching, possibly? IP: Logged |
|
Phil Member |
"fawning sycophant" See, this is what bothers me about Michael the most. He uses two fancy words when one hyphenated, down-to-earth term is better. The guy who called us "butt-lickers" was much more succinct, in my opinion. IP: Logged |
|
BongoFury Member |
Will Bilson goes on to explain (edit to add: in the 6th and 7th steps) that we try to achieve perfection and fall short but nonetheless try to achieve perfection. That allows ol' Will to rationalize his real-life inclinations to lie, cheat, swindle and defraud. Then I look at Will Bilson's brevity in explaining sex problems in the Big Book, saying that it's up to God alone to judge our sex situation, and I see it's a pretty handy way for Will Bilson to forgive himself for being a 13th stepping pig. I find it strange he had so little to say about sex problems - Bilson seemed to have plenty to say about everything else. Will Bilson was a walking, talking fruitcake! (Also edit to add [This message has been edited by BongoFury (edited 10-21-2003).] [This message has been edited by BongoFury (edited 10-21-2003).] IP: Logged |
|
Buttercup Member |
quote: Dear Michael: You really are the humour-impaired twit. I put lots of If you want to go through at that folderole, those FMIs, those weepy-eyed confession-sessions with some dumb-@55 sponsor who's probably as screwed-up as you are, and all the rest of the BS, then, by all means, enjoy! quote: Speaking for myself, it's too GD much effort for too little return. I'd rather work one "Step" -- "I will never drink again and I will never change my mind" -- and be done with the problem once and for all [This message has been edited by Buttercup (edited 10-23-2003).] IP: Logged |
|
Buttercup Member |
quote: Dear Michael: You really are the humour-impaired twit. I put lots of If you want to go through at that folderole, those FMIs, those weepy-eyed confession-sessions with some dumb-@55 sponsor who's probably as screwed-up as you are, and all the rest of the BS, then, by all means, enjoy! quote: Speaking for myself, it's too GD much effort for too little return. I'd rather work one "Step" -- "I will never drink again and I will never change my mind" -- and be done with the problem once and for all ![]() IP: Logged |
|
Paula Member |
Right On!!!!!! quote: IP: Logged |
|
PizzaMan Member |
Hmm ... The only step I like is Step 14. AA's steps 1-12 totally whacked me out, and made me much sicker than I was prior to AA. Sure, Bill and Bob meant well, but the road to ruin is lined with good intentions. Step 13 is already reserved (that's a term in AA when a person with some long term sobriety starts dating/doing someone new to AA. "Hey, Baby, c'mon up and I'll take you thru the steps". So, (ahem) Step 14 is when one either hits the wall with booze/drugs/12 step groups or all the above and makes a crisp decision/Big Plan, and learns AVRT. 14 is when one can unflinchingly shit-can all the 12 step literature (physically), ideas, feelings, notes, 4th steps, 8th steps, brainwashing, and thoughts the AA has you believe. 14 is when you make a large sparkely patio using chips. The patio is like a tomb of an era of pain and hell I'd like to respect, but never go back to, and step into permanent, sustained abstainence. I am 12-step-averse, but the intent of some of the steps, and the usefulness of some of them are part of my life. Example: I just took a look at some stuff I said to a friend and afterward I thought about it (some AA nazi's might say "well, that's step 10!!", and to them I say which came first, Bill and Bob, or introspection?). -Pizzaman IP: Logged |
|
Rational4Life Member |
Hello all, } ) I am new to this whole Rational Recovery thing and I must say the Rational Recovery book is "singing" to me! I have recently been introduced, "rather forcibly" to the world of AA and I am sooooo glad that I had the presence of mind to not get "taken in" or sucked into the kind of thinking that they promote. From the very first meeting I attended, I never felt comfortable. Not even for a second. I tried to give it a chance, but the whole time I was at the meetings, I was thinking that there is something very wrong with what was going on. I kept telling my family that I thought it was a weird ~cult~ and that all the people do is replace alcohol with meetings and that the people never get better. I just couldn't understand how relying upon other people and/or some abstract "higher power" to stop drinking was doing anyone any good. To me, those people are severely stunting their soul's evolution. They accept this absolutely ridiculous idea that they are diseased for life, and they will remain so until they die. Does that make sense? To accept that you were born ~sick~ and are doomed for life???? Now that I have read about Rational Recovery and have made my BP, I will never say that I am an addict or an alcoholic again. I am living in a place with a lot of people and we have morning meetings where everyone says something to "check in". I told them that I will not participate in the NEGATIVE daily affirmation nonsense ever again. (Hi my name is "so n so" and I am an addict) Instead I choose to affirm something positive about myself and am sticking to that. Rational Recovery has awakened me to accepting responsibility for my life and because of that, I am going to be able to get my life back on-track and never let anything (beastly) take me down again. My beast may be strong...but ultimately, he has no chance whatsoever at controlling me ever again. I feel like I want to be a motivational speaker for RR! (That's how fired up RR has gotten me. } IP: Logged |
All times are PST (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
Rational Recovery® and Addictive Voice Recognition Technique® (AVRT®) are registered trademarks owned by Rational Recovery Systems,Inc.